What Happens When an Adviser Gives Bad Advice?
Key takeaways:
- Complain in writing to the licensee first — standard IDR response within 30 days with reasons and AFCA rights
- AFCA is free and binding on firms: claim limits ~$1.26m, compensation generally to $631,500 for direct loss (2024 rules)
- Winning evidence maps loss to breach — s961B/G failures, fee errors, unsuitable switching — with SOA, statements and timelines
- Systemic issues and serious breaches go to ASIC; CSLR is a last-resort compensation avenue in narrow cases
IDR → AFCA → regulator: the full consequence chain in plain English
Step 1 — Licensee IDR (30 Days)
Complain to the licensee, not just your adviser, citing RG 271: state each breach plainly (e.g. no alternatives analysis, undisclosed fees, unsuitable SMSF switch), attach SOA, FSG, fee consents, statements and a loss calculation, and demand the written IDR response within 30 days for standard complaints (45 super trustee, 90 death-benefit, 21 credit default). The letter must state outcome, reasons, AFCA rights with contacts and time limits. Keep lodgement proof — AFCA generally requires IDR completion first and complaints within 2 years of the IDR response. See RG 271 rights.
Step 2 — AFCA: What It Can Award
AFCA covers inappropriate advice, best-interests failures, incorrect fees and misleading conduct, testing breach, causation and but-for loss — what position would you be in with appropriate advice? Remedies include fee refunds, corrected calculations, claim payments and compensation for direct loss (generally to $631,500 per claim under January 2024 caps; claim limit ~$1.263m; super unlimited in some classes; plus interest/costs). Non-financial loss is capped low (~$6,300). Firms pay case fees and are bound if you accept; rejecting preserves court rights. AFCA delivered over $1.07b systemically-flagged compensation historically and must refer systemic issues to regulators under RG 267. Guides: AFCA help and ombudsman process.
Evidence Pack That Wins (Checklist)
AFCA tests breach, causation and but-for loss — assertions without documents lose. Bundle: (1) SOA/ROA plus FSG and PDS cooling-off pages showing disclosure gaps; (2) fact-find versus recommendations gap table (goals, risk profile, capacity) mapping each s961B safe-harbour miss; (3) fee arithmetic — SOA quoted versus FDS charged versus benchmark medians ($4,700) with dollar totals over 1/3/5 years; (4) alternative quotes the adviser should have compared (lower-fee fund, retained super cover, stepped vs level); (5) statements showing loss versus but-for position (e.g. staying in original fund); (6) chronology with IDR lodgement proof and response. Dixon-era outcomes (98% of determined advice complaints upheld, $35.6m awarded) show documentation beats testimony. Attach an AdviserCheck six-layer report as index — adjudicators triage faster with severity-ranked, evidence-linked findings across completeness, best interests and fees.
Step 3 — ASIC, Breach Reports and CSLR
ASIC does not resolve individual compensation — it polices licensees via bans, licence conditions and court action on breach reports (RG 78: significant within 30 days), IDR data dashboards and AFCA systemic referrals under RG 267. Recent enforcement (Shield Master Fund bans, fee-for-no-service actions, unregistered-advice infringements) began as consumer complaints with strong files. Your AFCA evidence pack doubles as an ASIC misconduct report where advice was unlicensed, conflicted or loss-causing at scale.
Your AFCA evidence pack doubles as an ASIC misconduct report where advice was unlicensed, conflicted or loss-causing at scale. The Compensation Scheme of Last Resort covers narrow unpaid AFCA determinations (generally advice-related, capped, eligibility-tested) — treat as backstop, not first resort. An AdviserCheck report mapping s961B/G, fee and contradiction findings into IDR/AFCA forms shortens triage and sharpens quantum.SPONSORED: Get NordVPN here! — keeps uploads private on public Wi-Fi.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long do firms get to respond?
30 days standard; 45 super trustee; 90 death-benefit distribution; 21 credit default. Written reasons plus AFCA details required.
What compensation is realistic?
But-for direct loss to caps above, plus fee refunds and interest. Non-financial loss is small. Document quantum with statements, not assertions.
Can AFCA revisit super trustee decisions?
Yes within its super jurisdiction, including death-benefit distribution complaints under longer timeframes.
Should I go to ASIC first?
No for compensation — IDR then AFCA, after confirming AFCA membership via the firm search. Report to ASIC in parallel where misconduct is systemic or ongoing.
What are AFCA time limits?
Generally within 2 years of the licensee's IDR response (6 years from the issue for super trustee complaints, longer for death-benefit delays). Lodge promptly — late complaints need exceptional circumstances and supporting evidence.
Turning file failures into a compensation claim takes evidence hours. If this roadmap helped, a $5 donation keeps it current.
Secure via Stripe. Prefer ad-free? Donations keep sponsors minimal.
How AdviserCheck Supports Claims
Severity-ranked s961B/G and fee findings paste into IDR/AFCA forms. Try a free check.
Related guides:
Need evidence for IDR or AFCA? — free credit to start
Try AdviserCheck FreeLast updated: 2026-09-15. Informational only, not legal advice. Confirm current limits with AFCA before lodging, as caps index periodically.
By AdviserCheck Editorial Team · Reviewed by Compliance Review Team | 2026-09-15
Checked against ASIC regulatory guides, legislation and AFCA outcomes. See editorial policy.