What is s961G? Appropriate Advice Duty Explained

Key takeaways:

What is s961G?

Section 961G of the Corporations Act requires that the advice given to a client must be appropriate to the client circumstances. This is a separate obligation from the best interests duty under s961B. Even if an adviser has acted in the client best interests the resulting advice must still be suitable for that client.

How s961G Differs from s961B

While s961B focuses on the process the adviser follows in formulating advice s961G focuses on the outcome. An adviser can follow every safe harbour step and still breach s961G if the resulting recommendation is not appropriate for the client circumstances. Both duties must be satisfied.

AdviserCheck puts no paywall on its guides. If you value independent consumer information, a small contribution helps us keep publishing.

Secure payment via Stripe. No account needed.

Practical Compliance

To comply with s961G advisers must ensure their recommendations align with the client stated goals risk profile investment timeframe and financial situation. The SOA must clearly document this alignment. Boilerplate language that does not reflect individual circumstances is a common compliance gap.

Common Pitfalls

The most common s961G breaches occur when advisers recommend products that do not match the client risk profile or when recommendations are made without adequate consideration of the client financial situation. ASIC enforcement actions frequently cite s961G breaches alongside s961B failures.

What the Appropriate Advice Duty Requires

Section 961G of the Corporations Act 2001 requires that when personal advice is provided to a client, the advice must be appropriate to the client's circumstances. This means the adviser must have reasonable grounds to believe the advice is suitable for the client based on the client's objectives, financial situation, and needs as disclosed to the adviser.

The appropriate advice duty is distinct from the best interests duty in s961B. While s961B sets out the process the adviser must follow (a step-by-step duty to act in the client's best interests), s961G addresses the outcome — the advice itself must be appropriate for that specific client. Even if an adviser follows the best interests process correctly, if the resulting advice is not appropriate for the client, they may still breach s961G.

How Advisers Demonstrate Compliance

To demonstrate compliance with s961G, the adviser must document the link between the client's disclosed circumstances and the advice recommendations. The SOA should clearly show: the client's objectives and what they want to achieve, the client's financial situation (income, assets, liabilities, risk profile), the client's needs (specific financial goals or concerns), and how each recommendation addresses those specific circumstances.

A common compliance failure is using standardised advice that does not sufficiently consider the individual client's circumstances. For example, recommending the same super fund to every client without considering differences in insurance needs, fee structures, or investment options. Each recommendation should be tailored to the client's specific situation, and the SOA should explain why that particular product or strategy is appropriate for that particular client.

Consumer Protections Under s961G

The appropriate advice duty provides important consumer protection. If your adviser recommends a financial product or strategy that is not suitable for your circumstances, you may have a claim for breach of s961G. For the duty to apply, you must have provided the adviser with accurate information about your circumstances, and the advice must be "personal advice" (as opposed to general advice).

If you believe your adviser breached the appropriate advice duty, you can: request a copy of your SOA and review whether the advice is consistent with your disclosed circumstances, lodge a complaint with the adviser's internal dispute resolution process, escalate to AFCA if unsatisfied, and seek compensation for any financial loss caused by the inappropriate advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between s961B and s961G?
s961B (best interests duty) is about the process the adviser follows — they must take specified steps to act in the client's best interests. s961G (appropriate advice duty) is about the outcome — the advice itself must be appropriate for the client. An adviser can comply with s961B but breach s961G if the advice is not suitable.

Can I claim compensation if my adviser breached s961G?
Yes. If your adviser provided advice that was not appropriate for your circumstances and you suffered financial loss, you may be entitled to compensation. Lodge a complaint through the adviser's internal dispute resolution process or escalate to AFCA.

What happens if I give my adviser incomplete information?
The appropriate advice duty is based on the circumstances disclosed to the adviser. If you provide incomplete or inaccurate information, the adviser's duty is limited to assessing what you told them. Always provide full and accurate information to your adviser to ensure the advice is appropriate.

Does s961G apply to general advice?
No. The appropriate advice duty (and the best interests duty) applies only to personal advice. General advice is subject to different requirements, including the requirement to give a general advice warning. Your adviser should clearly state whether advice is general or personal.

How AdviserCheck Checks Best Interests Duty

AdviserCheck's best interests duty (s961B) layer examines whether your adviser identified your objectives and needs, considered a reasonable range of alternatives, and recommended products that genuinely meet your circumstances. The tool flags any gaps in the inquiry and consideration process required under FOFA. Upload your SOA for a free analysis.

Interested in learning more about compliance tools for financial advice?

Try AdviserCheck Free

Last updated: 2026-09-12. This guide is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or legal advice.

By AdviserCheck Editorial Team

Privacy Policy · About · Editorial Policy