State of Financial Advice in Australia — 2026 Industry Report
Reviewed August 2026 — industry statistics current as at publication.
Key takeaways:
- The Australian financial advice industry continues to consolidate, with fewer advisers serving a growing client base
- Technology adoption, including AI-powered compliance tools, is transforming how advice is delivered and documented
- Consumer trust in financial advice is recovering following the Royal Commission reforms and increased regulatory oversight
- The demand for affordable advice is driving innovation in scaled advice models and digital advice solutions
Key trends and statistics shaping the financial advice profession
Adviser Numbers and Demographics
The financial advice profession has stabilised after several years of decline. Adviser numbers have settled around 15,500-15,600 registered advisers following the introduction of the exam, FASEA requirements, and the Royal Commission. The profession is ageing and attracting new entrants remains a priority.
Regulatory Environment
The regulatory environment continues to evolve with DBFO reforms, ASIC enforcement priorities, and ongoing Royal Commission implementation. Compliance remains the top concern for most practices.
We publish these guides free because consumers deserve independent information. A $5 donation helps cover the cost of keeping them accurate.
Payments are processed securely by Stripe — no account required.
Technology Adoption
Technology adoption in financial advice is accelerating. Practices are increasingly using AI-powered tools for compliance, client engagement, and practice management. Automated compliance analysis is becoming a standard tool for proactive firms.
Industry Challenges
Key challenges facing the profession include compliance costs, adviser recruitment and retention, managing regulatory change, and demonstrating value to clients. Practices that invest in compliance technology are better positioned to address these challenges.
Industry Structure and Adviser Numbers
The Australian financial advice industry has undergone significant structural change since the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry. Total adviser numbers have declined from approximately 28,000 in 2019 to around 15,500 in 2025-26, driven by higher education standards (the FASEA exam and degree requirements), increased compliance costs, and the exit of major banks from wealth management.
This consolidation has created an advice gap, with an estimated 1.5 million Australians who would like financial advice unable to access it affordably. The remaining advisers are concentrated in larger licensees and self-licensed practices, with a trend toward vertically integrated models being replaced by independent advice practices. The average adviser age is approximately 50, raising concerns about future capacity as the current cohort approaches retirement.
Technology and Compliance Transformation
Technology adoption is rapidly transforming financial advice in Australia. AI-powered compliance tools are automating SOA generation, file review, and regulatory reporting, significantly reducing the time advisers spend on compliance tasks. Purpose-built regtech solutions are replacing manual checking processes, enabling advisers to focus more on client engagement and strategic advice rather than documentation.
The use of AI in advice generation raises important regulatory questions. ASIC has issued guidance on the use of AI in financial services, emphasising that licensees remain responsible for advice quality regardless of the technology used to generate it. Advisers must ensure that AI-generated advice documents are reviewed by a qualified human adviser and that the technology does not introduce bias or errors. The best interests duty applies equally to AI-assisted advice.
Consumer Access and Affordability
The affordability of financial advice remains a significant challenge for Australian consumers. The average cost of comprehensive financial advice ranges from $2,500 to $6,000, placing it beyond the reach of many households. The government is exploring options to improve access, including expanding the scope of superannuation fund member advice and allowing for more scalable advice models.
Scaled advice (also known as limited-scope advice) is becoming more common, with advisers offering specific advice on individual topics such as super contributions, insurance, or debt management at lower cost. Digital advice platforms (robo-advice) are also emerging, though they remain limited in scope and are more suitable for simpler financial decisions. Consumers should understand what type of advice they are receiving and whether it meets their needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I find a qualified financial adviser in Australia?
Use ASIC's Financial Advisers Register to search for licensed advisers. Check their qualifications, experience, and disciplinary history. You can also ask professional bodies like the Financial Advice Association Australia (FAAA) for member referrals. Always verify that the adviser holds a current AFSL or is an authorised representative.
What is the difference between independent and restricted advice?
Independent (or non-aligned) advisers are not owned by a financial institution and can recommend products from the whole market. Restricted advisers are aligned with a specific institution or product range. Independent advice may offer more choice but often costs more.
How much does financial advice cost on average?
Comprehensive financial advice typically costs $2,500-$6,000 for an initial SOA, with ongoing advice fees of $1,500-$4,000 per year. Scaled advice on a single topic may cost $800-$2,000. Fee-for-service models are now standard, replacing the commission-based models common before FOFA reforms.
Is digital advice (robo-advice) regulated in Australia?
Yes, digital advice is regulated by ASIC under the same AFSL framework as human advice. The provider must hold an AFSL, comply with the best interests duty (to the extent applicable), and have appropriate compensation arrangements. Digital advice is generally limited to simpler financial situations.
The 2024-25 ASIC Scorecard for Financial Advice
Treat this as a running ledger of what regulators caught — and what clients missed until it was too late. Across 2024-25: $104.1 million in court-ordered penalties, 19 criminal convictions, 38 new civil proceedings, and 58 individuals or companies banned or restricted from financial services. Investigation volume grew roughly 50% year-on-year.
The entries worth reading closely:
- Shield Master Fund (2024-25). Receivers appointed; fund wound up after concerns about inappropriate advice and inadequate disclosure.
- MWL Financial Services (2025). Four advisers banned for terms of 4–8 years for recommending the fund contrary to clients' best interests.
- Glenda Rogan (2025). 10-year ban for moving $14.8 million of client funds into a cryptocurrency-based investment scam.
- Barry King (2025). Permanent ban spanning dishonest conduct, misuse of client funds and provision of false documents.
- Fees-for-no-service actions (2024-25). Several licensees and advisers pursued, including Crown Wealth Group director Andrew Moore, banned for non-reporting of FFNOS conduct.
- Unregistered advice (2025). Infringement notices of $31,300 each issued to licensees including Skye Money and Smart Financial Capital.
Alongside the casework, ASIC has publicly worried about business models that use high-pressure selling and better-return promises to go after Australians' superannuation savings.
Basis: ASIC Annual Report 2025; ASIC Financial Advice Update, August 2025.
Regulatory Timeline: 2012 to Today
Each reform below changed what your adviser must do and disclose. Knowing the timeline helps you judge how current your document's obligations are.
| Date | Reform | Impact on Consumers |
|---|---|---|
| July 2012 | FOFA enacted | Best interests duty (s961B), ban on conflicted remuneration, opt-in for ongoing fees |
| July 2013 | FOFA mandatory | Full compliance required — advisers must act in your best interests |
| July 2016 | Accountants' exemption repealed | Accountants need AFSL to give SMSF advice, increasing consumer protection |
| 2018-2023 | Royal Commission + response | FEAR Act (2019) — higher penalties, breach reporting, enforceable director duties |
| Dec 2022 | QAR Final Report | 22 recommendations including simplified SOAs, new adviser class, streamlined best interests duty |
| July 2024 | DBFO Tranche 1 | FSG website disclosure option, conflicted remuneration clarification |
| Jan 2025 | DBFO changes commence | Fee Disclosure Statements removed, streamlined ongoing fee consents, legal clarity for super advice fee deductions |
| Mar 2025 | DBFO Tranche 2 draft | SOA rationalisation, collective charging for super, super fund targeted prompts. Best interests duty modernisation and new adviser class still in development. |
Compiled from ASIC regulatory guidance, Treasury’s DBFO implementation materials, the FAAA DBFO Hub and the APESB QAR review.
Where AdviserCheck Fits in This Landscape
This page explains the rule; AdviserCheck applies it. Our engine encodes FOFA obligations, the s961B best interests duty, RG 175 content standards and DBFO requirements into structured checks, then runs three independent AI models over your document. What reaches you is a short list of gaps that matter, each tied back to the obligation behind it. Put the rules to work on your own document — the first check is free.
Independent verification, on demand — start with a free check
Try AdviserCheck FreeLast updated: 2026-09-12. This guide is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.